The Studio Visit & Fuck Faces (2008): an attractive art collector makes a studio visit to a desperate artist who is trying to sell his newest works. A video (9 min) & 2 framed reliefs (60 cm x 70 cm each). Actors: DanDara ViTaL & Kristofer Paetau. Camera: Ondrej Brody.

CLICK HERE TO VIEW QUICKTIME MOVIE   /  CLICK HERE TO VIEW WINDOWS MEDIA MOVIE




The Studio Visit (Fuck Faces) (2008) by Kristofer Paetau


Share

57 Responses to “ The Studio Visit & Fuck Faces (2008) ”


  1. What the fuck is this trans porn?


  2. Very nice collector fucking artworks and the artist also! :-)


  3. hm
    ach jo


  4. bof, how many variations can you make on this guys….


  5. Well yes for starters I think you should learn to refrain from your formal values being so nuanced and subtle in your work. Learn how to use denotation instead of connotation in your work. Learn how to refrain from overly using ambiguity and outright vagueness in your work it only confuses and befuddles your viewer. Directness is always the best course of action as it only makes your intentionality that much clearer to your audience.


  6. adolescent dream


  7. Chaps you are obviously geniuses but can I ask you cunts to stop spamming me? Thanks awfully. Keep taking the pills
    My name is Hamish McBlowjob and I work for Dell in their Arsing Around Department


  8. Love it, great piece of ass – I mean art! Here’s a painting you might like http://www.slowart.com/slow/food/image1.htm


  9. stupid


  10. Have you been to San Francisco?


  11. excellent. amazing. rio de janeiro, travestis, gringo artists… but i think it would be a better movie and art experienc if you let the brazilian guy cum in your mouth. i would sure lovely buy your covered mouth with brazilian cum for R$3,50. interested?


  12. ART MUST TO BE THE BETTER EXPRESSION OF HE BEST SPIRITS OF UMANITY , INSTEAD THIS IS ONLY THE EXPRESSION OF A LITTLE SOUL INTO THE DARK OF A MIND THAT IS NOT BE ABLE TO GO OUT FROM CONFUSION !!!


  13. hehe


  14. Magnificent!!!


  15. :D


  16. Ha! Genius


  17. :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P


  18. spam


  19. :)


  20. That’s a riot. P.S How will you sell this when it is to easy to download.


  21. Lame


  22. Now who will buy these pieces with trans cum & shit varnish ??????
    I guess you really don’t want people to like your work. Even though the works are formally sympathetic and well done you ruin everything by this gesture… Probably you like people to hate your work?


  23. I like it!


  24. dream on


  25. This O. Brody guy is smart. Mark my words – the installations will sell for 7,000 to 10,000 Euro.


  26. Weak! But you got me to watch your video because sex is always attractive.


  27. She should fuck the guy.


  28. very well Gianni Cella


  29. this is very sexy and very typical of the art world


  30. This is fantastic! So much of what is fobbed off as art today is banal, trivial and boring. But this is exciting and a delight to look at!
    Cheers!


  31. Dear friends
    I love your work.
    But your promotion-mails are much too frequent at the moment! Please dont’t make me unsubscibe.
    best regards!


  32. Here is the thinking yes. Power should go back to the art itself. Porn sells and the artist could use it to advantage. Are things not forced to be so? Do we not have free will as artists and as human beings?


  33. just a very nice expression of vulgarity, maybe you should organise an exhibition in a “nice” sex shop, at least you provided art education to a great public ! what do you think ??


  34. It reminds me of Stefano Pasquini, although he doesn’t really imply sexual acts in his playful installations.


  35. I like the big black and white drawings at the beginning!
    Jjoffe


  36. i bet asslicking the curator is more like drawn from christophers own experience.
    hopefully you will tour with all through europe, too.


  37. some people confuse art to something other…

    very poor, stupid… i have lost five minutes of my life watching this piece of …


  38. strong work as always, ondrej please write me via my website sometime. sands, amsterdam. x


  39. Nice shit! The artist portrayed as the poor guy trying desperately to make a living and to grab some attention like these guys brodypaetau really do.


  40. Aside from the horrible acting, ridiculous dialogue, utterly implausible scenario, horrid casting, academic art and amateurish direction, it was truly a waste of time.


  41. yep, just like writing these few words, a waste of time, i.e. zeitverschwendung


  42. I found it’s a very interesting waste of time and not academic at all but maybe I’M too old fashioned?


  43. SEAN O’SHARP SAYS: I’VE HAD A HUNCH FOR QUITE SOME TIME : “FUCK ART” .


  44. Exactly!


  45. Obviously you got it wrong. It’s easy to see that she is not a collector. She is a curator for a national art collection and now that she had such fun, she will slate the piece and the artist to her colleagues and buy yet another piece by a ‘household name’ artist.


  46. i wanted to say ‘fuck you’ first… but actually you are right. the question just is… do we need anyone to remind us about what a shit world we live in?


  47. dont like the artwork however .. but the film is great .. thats how it is


  48. I wonder if the “artworks” were just props for making the film?


  49. A bad idea poor executed…


  50. This was truly an engrossing film, from the collectors first words (you knew immediatelty she was a tranny, till her exit from the studio I was mesmerized. First I identified with the artist’s desperation and then thought him naivee to think she would actually buy the piece. However it really did resemble Louise Bourgeous’s work, in particular her apron of penislike forms she had modeled at her MOMA opening in the 80′s. Louise once asked me if I likes Bob Henri’s work to which I replied “too many loose sexual parts floating around”. Who did I think I was talking to. Anywat the sexual parts of this piece were much more functional than any of Bourgeous.s work. Fuck face could even be enjoyed by the blind, congratulations to the artist for his “inclusion” format. I don’t know how many blind perverts there are but this is the market I think the artist should persue. and develop ..why doesn’t anyone sign thier comments? Robert


  51. I like it. And what I like is that it’s not a one off. Do it again.
    *simon


  52. I do not sleep the fourth day, – I turn in my new bed and I shiver from a cold, you are not present with me beside, – I cry and I wish to be forgotten, but alcohol only for a while allows me to make it! If you only knew as your photo from the passport has wounded my defenceless heart!


  53. I agree with Robert, this is a truly functional piece of art to be enjoyed physically and sexually! But what makes it different from a dildo (which could also be considered a sculpture)? It would be interesting to imagine museums where people would be making love to the works but unfortunately this will never happen… ;-) Jonas


  54. your work is horrible. i don’t know how you can do it. you should be ashamed, this site will be closed


  55. I love this site


  56. annette messanger and mike kelly would be happy to watch this video, wouldn’t they?


  57. Maybe Mike Kelley would like it but Annette Messenger I don’t think so. This work is far too direct to please to most people…